Vista

Alright, let's talk about Micro Soft Windows Vista. Vista offers a lot in the way of a new and improved OS. It has enhanced GUI, improved security, improved performance, and is the central pillar for the future of gaming. It uses hardware to power it's new GUI, running a lot of the new graphics through your graphics card itself instead of the CPU. This feature allows more use of the CPU for other more critical functions. Vista is the catalyst for the new directx 10 wave of GFX cards. DX10 compared to DX9 is like comparing Win32 to Win95. It's a vast leap froward from a stagnant period. The time between vista's release and XP's release is the single longest period between two windows operating systems, and this has not gone unnoticed by the majority of people in the online community i know. The lengthy time was mostly speculated to be from the massive incapability and lack of backwards compatibility with other windows software. A lot of information on Vista can be found on Wiki, which is where i learned most of the technical and nuisance things from. One thing on the wiki that i found which is my main complaint about what windows did with vista is with the windows classic mode. I'm a conservative person who fears the oncoming inevitable change the world presents. Every time i install XP, which is often, I immediately switch it to the classic mode. Apparently what windows has done is made the classic mode for business environments so as to make it less visually taxing, rather than the set up of the GUI itself. this quote off the wiki relays my concerns "Thurrott offers the opinion that Windows Vista's classic visual style is 'horrible' and a 'misbegotten excuse for a UI.'" I like the way XP looks and is set up. Microsoft has a sound defense against the "they made it look like OSx" claim stating they had certain OSx type features and looks planned and displayed well before vista beta 1. The problem is, it still looks like OSx, and i hate it. I plan on buying Vista, but rest assured, i'm going to despise it for being so different for a long time.

Blue Ray and Sony. Reading up on the blue ray player, the blue ray, and the blue ray disc, this piece of technology offers much in the way of potential. Typical DVDs can hold 4.7GB's of information on them, while blue ray discs can hold up to 25GB (single layer). The player uses an ultraviolet light which operates at a much lower wavelength than the typical red lasers we currently use. This feature allows for enhanced photonic storage of data and thus the increase in overall size. There are even some multi-layer single and double sided BD's in production and use that can support anywhere between 250GB - 300GB on a single side. I've heard one possible use for the Blue Ray over the HD is in PC gaming. Piracy is the bane of any game maker's day. What the Blue ray offers over the HD DVD is simply larger size. A tactic the gaming industry is trying to implement is the use of game bloating. They will try as hard as they can to increase the size of the game program in an effort to make it so you can't pirate it. The only real problem i can see with this is the amount of time they are going to invest in bloating the game's code and the cost it will take to simply waste all of the space on a disc. The only thing about the Blue Ray i don't really like is the fact that Sony is the master of creating and developing new technologies, and yet they simply seem to fade out of existence because Sony fail to market them correctly. While they did not create the Blue Ray, they are backing it with their obviously failing release of the PS3.

Newsgroups

Newsgroups were a marvelous innovation of their day. Connecting several people via the Internet to share all various types of data. Today they have taken on a forum for piracy and other various sorts of things, unless you're Canadian, then it's not illegal. Usenet is the most recent form within the past years. If you've ever used a forum before, think of it like that, only you transfer files. The interesting thing about it, however, is you have to pay for newsgroups. Which means that for an account you have a registered name to everything you download or upload, and yet somehow they have never been shut down. Not only that, but with a lot of ISP's it's free with your internet access. The thing i find noteworthy about this, is that all form of piracy are interesting. This one is by far the weirdest. People sacrifice the never paying for anything, with paying for a subscription to gain insane amount of speed to download with. Personally i find piracy aids in the purchase of some things. The type of people who pirate simply never want to spend their money on things that are a waste of time, and today unfortunately most forms of media are standard and unoriginal. The cool thing about it however, is if you truly enjoy a product, you will go out and buy it. I've seen and heard this happen thousands of times from people who pirate everything. And a lot of them have Usenet accounts. I think the main points about all this is that simple little things that formed at the start of the Internet, newsgroups, are helpind to aid in what the legal system thinks is theft. It's an interesting paradox, but people who pirate, dopay for things that are worth it. So it's really an incentive for a gaming company, a movie studio, a record label, ect. to truly be original and break the mold. Enhancing every one's entertainment experience, and not just some one's wallet.